Saillogger Community

@wrwakefield I had no doubts that everything would be fine. These guys at Saillogger are very concrete and good. Hurray!

@wrwakefield Good luck

@wrwakefield Sorry last suggestion, have you tried asking on the Victron website?

@wrwakefield Actually a case study. Since you have the Cerbo GX have you ever installed a plugin in SK? because it seems strange that in a native configuration like that of version 3.50 with Venus Large, Signal K can give problems, I have used numerous Cerbo even with versions prior to 3.50 and both Signal K and Node Red have always worked well. Of course in Signal K has it made your login and password and do you access with those correctly?

@wrwakefield Hi Bill, so since you updated to VenusOs 3.62 on Venus SK have you managed to update to saillogger 4.21 or not?

@admin Hi Admin, and thanks again for the assistance you gave me yesterday after the plugin 4.2.1 did not install I was worried. Saillogger has now become a travel companion that cannot be missed. Last year I also made the same request, to have in the report of a trip the possibility of seeing the Distance/duration field divided by sail and engine. Also when I click on a point of my route to be able to customize the data of that telemetry (eg TWS TWA AWA SOG etc). I think that being able to customize the list of fields that Saillogger stores on a point of the log should not be a heavy development so each navigator can populate his path with the data he prefers. Regarding the engine data transducer to N2K I have had the YachtDevice one for a year and it works well. So if you allow me the final question, where are we on these new features? Thanks a lot

news: after the update saillogger restarted regularly in version 4.2.1. It seems everything is solved. I just hope VenusOs does not enter into crisis. Thanks for the prompt assistance

yes I can do it, previously I had installed version 3.62 when it came out but it seemed unstable in my situation, the Cerbo would restart repeatedly and so I went back to version 3.55. I can try again anyway. Couldn't we go back to version 4.1 of saillogger?

Yes unfortunately, when trying to update my 4.1 version of the saillogger plugin I received the message "failed". I tried again but same message. I still have Venus Os 3.55

Hello to all saillogger friends, unfortunately I had not read this post before and I installed the 4.2.1 update which obviously did not install. However, there is a variant in my case that I would like to report, I still have version 3.55 and although this version is reported as the one on which 4.2.1 works, in my case it is not installed, could there be a solution in my case?

Hello to all saillogger friends, unfortunately I had not read this post before and I installed the 4.2.1 update which obviously did not install. However, there is a variant in my case that I would like to report, I still have version 3.55 and although this version is reported as the one on which 4.2.1 works, in my case it is not installed, could there be a solution in my case?

regarding the Navigation.Position pgn on the N2K bus of my boat although I saw two of them (129025 and 129039) SL told me that it did not have a GPS position, I solved it by activating in the Victron plugin on SK "Use de position from Venus Os", now I have a third pgn that also provides altitude, with this SL confirms the GPS position. So it is not easy to understand what is happening here too, why did SL not see the Navigation.Position pgn that I said above?

Thanks for the reply, I sent the link to the path, (https://saillogger.com/log/021878) I hope this is useful to show you what happened. Just thinking that the problem could be related to pgns that are not available on SK (navigation.position) due to hardware causes (heat for canbus) or RB that crashes, I switched to SK on Cerbo GX that I already have on board. I don't know if this system is more stable than the one installed on RB through Openplotter 3 which contains routines that I don't use and potentially causes crashes. Since I installed SK on Cerbo GX I haven't gone out yet, but I will first enable debugging which could help us in similar cases, the only thing is the debug logo coming directly to you?

@admin Thanks for the quick response, your customer service is second to none. How do I share my track?

Hello everyone, the title to discuss two topics and ask your opinion or that of Ilker if he reads us; I recently started using SL which until yesterday ran on SK of Openplotter 3 on RB pi4, and I noticed that as long as I have an LTE connection the recording of the route is done correctly (unless RB decides to block) but if I lose the LTE connection the track stops resuming when I find the connection again and making a line without intermediate points. This makes me think that the SL Plugin on SK does not record the intermediate data in a buffer, is that so? Second thing observed in the tracks the wind speed sometimes has high values ​​and not seen during navigation, this makes me think that SL takes the data from the N2K bus without any damping and records a data at a time that is not representative (in fact on my chartplotter there are settings for the damping of values ​​read by the wind meter). Does anyone know this phenomenon? Thanks